Swindling our children, sabotaging our future

Even if You do not speak Polish,many Poles do speak English.If You would like to share something interesting with us ,in English,feel free to do so-HERE

Swindling our children, sabotaging our future

Postprzez caretaker » So maja 16, 2015 10:51 pm

Common Core is a Soviet school system
meant to turn kids into obedient robots
no longer able — or willing — to think
. . . and maybe none of this ever needed to happen

By John Kaminski
pseudoskylax@gmail.com
http://therebel.is/en/kaminski

I think parents today don't realize that society is a scam in which they are convinced they're in control of their own lives
when they're not. Because they were roped into the scam themselves and still mostly can't perceive it, parents don't train
their kids to watch out for it. They don't get it because they never saw it, and now they're trapped in it. Instead, parents
teach their kids to climb high in society and be accepted by it. They all wind up being deceived when they realize what
their kids really learned was to forfeit their own freedom and betray who they really are and could be.

The scam starts at birth, winds through a toxic labyrinth of disingenuous doctors and egomaniacal educators, careens through
a childhood of poison ingestions, and winds up in a place that finishes them off as potentially healthy human beings,
a place that has never been more dangerous than it is today — schools.

Today, schools are the place where kids lose their minds for good.

And it isn't the gang violence or street drugs that gets them — it's the school itself, the diabolical curriculum and
the brainwashed teachers dispensing information that will actually make them stupider and retard their progress in life.

Today you could say schools are rotten to the core — the Common Core.

This new Common Core curriculum that state school boards of education in the United States were bribed to accept
with alluring offers of lucrative federal grants has not only triggered a nationwide rebellion urging rejection of this
diabolical educational plan, but is actually a carbon copy of the old Soviet school curriculum which emphasized
getting students to believe deliberately false information in order to verify their unquestionable obedience to the state.

Hard to believe? Let me explain.

Attorney Robin S. Eubanks specializes in unraveling language that hides actual intended goals. "My experience allowed me
to recognize that education in the U.S. and globally has been for decades engaged in a massive Newspeak
(as in George Orwell's 1984) campaign that creates a public illusion on what is being promised and what is coming
to the schools and classrooms that are this country's future."

Author of the book "Credentialed to Destroy: How and Why Education Became a Weapon," Eubanks concludes,
"the real intended Common Core implementation . . . is wildly different from the PR sales job used to gain
adoption in most of the states." <http://www.invisibleserfscollar.com/about-me.html>

James Milgram, professor emeritus of mathematics at Stanford University, determined that the Common Core
mathematics standards leave American students two grade levels behind their peers internationally by the time
they reach seventh grade. He also found that they don’t prepare students for admission into highly selective
universities and STEM (science, technology, engineering, and mathematics) programs.
<http://dailysignal.com/2014/11/09/growing-opposition-common-core-iowa/>

The English standards are also suspect. Sandra Stotsky, professor of education reform emeritus at
the University of Arkansas, argues that Common Core’s “diminished emphasis on literature in the secondary
grades makes it unlikely that American students will study a meaningful range of culturally and historically
significant literary works before graduation.”

Most states initially jumped on the Common Core bandwagon, but in the past several years, a number
have jumped off. Bills to repeal Common Core have been introduced in 19 states so far in 2015
(down from 22 in 2014), but state legislatures have resisted reversing their approvals of this seriously
misleading program.
<http://www.politico.com/story/2015/02/unable-to-repeal-common-core-foes-try-sabotage-115522.html>

States accepted the Common Core program sight unseen, largely to reap a bevy of tantalizing federal incentives.
For example, in exchange for adopting Common Core, Iowa could have received a waiver from sanctions levied
by the federal No Child Left Behind law. It also had a chance to get some money from the Obama administration’s
$4.35 billion “Race to the Top” grant program. (It turned out Iowa lost its bid for grants twice but
did get a waiver from No Child Left Behind.)

Attorney Eubanks, whose website Invisible Serf's Collar contains a running commentary on this continuing
debate of heated national interest, summarizes the essence of the backlash against this disturbing educational
gambit whose objective was concealed behind the rationale of shifting priorities from basic skills to
"higher order thinking.
" <http://www.invisibleserfscollar.com/police-power-to-compel-adult-beliefs-meanwhile-values-manipulation-captures-young-minds-forever/>

After attending many hearings in which obscurantist educational jargon overwhelmed common sense thanks
to the presence of police who prevented people from objecting to fanciful nonsense, Eubanks concluded that
competency in education today means changing people's basic values and controlling the direction of the change,
all with the goal of making them subservient and docile participants in the joys of the welfare state and
preventing them from asking any questions about it.

When she analyzed the components of this new program, "they were not about learning a body of knowledge.
They were training students to view the world in a certain way." Common Core education is not really about
learning facts as much as it is about teaching "prescribed behaviors," she explains.

Harness the mind and then ‘assess’ to see if the harness fits properly and guides behavior as desired.
If so, herald the student as performing ‘proficiently’ or ‘competently’ and thus being College and Career Ready." [...]

How very harness-like. Get each student used to the jerk of the tether while they are still young and their minds
are oh-so-malleable to manipulation. [...]

. . . this determined need to create false beliefs in adult citizens if they are paying attention . . . Education from
preschool to graduate school is all now to be about being “more of a ‘value producing agency’ than
an information-dispensing institution.”

In other words, this is the inculcation of brainwashing at the expense of dispensing actual knowledge

Translating the impenetrable educational jargon, this means the state no longer gives out reliable information;
it only wants to shape and distort the minds of pupils to endorse the ideas the government provides to them so it
can gauge the effectiveness of a program teaching students to believe the lies they are taught.

"These education reforms seem always designed to go hand in hand with an inexorable drive towards a
Government-Directed Welfare State," Eubanks writes in her blog. She also wrote:

Here’s what (Communist ideologue Herbert) Marcuse and others believe: obviously false statements about the present
do not matter because if people can be made to believe them anyway, they can still become those desired attitudes
and habits of mind.

In other words, behind our backs, U.S. education officials are replacing genuine education with what the state believes
and demands children ought to know. And it is not real knowledge, but only propaganda with no relation to truth or reality.

So, that's the school scam the USA is now facing. Too bad it's not the only colossal threat facing our children.

Glyphosate
http://www.truth-out.org/news/item/2994 ... -to-cancer

About 90 percent of the world's high volume grains are now "Roundup Ready." Glyphosate residues cannot be removed
by washing and they are not broken down by cooking. They remain in food for a year or more, even if the foods are frozen,
dried or processed. Eating strictly organic doesn't protect you. Several studies have shown that it is even present in
the air we breathe, water we drink and rain that falls from the sky. (1) Essentially, no one on earth has been spared.
A recent study of non-farmworker, urban dwellers in Germany found glyphosate in the urine of every person tested,
and at levels five to 20 times the legal limit for drinking water.

Cancer is far from the only concern about Roundup. The medical and toxicological literature examining the health
consequences of pesticides reads like a horror show. These deadly chemicals have been shown to be strongly associated
with higher rates of depression and suicide, impaired intellect, memory deficits, impaired psychomotor speed,
executive functioning, acceleration of the cognitive decline of aging, Alzheimer's and Parkinson's disease.

Gardasil
http://www.activistpost.com/2015/04/hpv ... ating.html

Well known vaccine critic Catherine J. Frompovich writes . . .
Well, if there ever were a vaccine that should scare the living daylights out of everyone, it is the HPV (human papillomavirus)
vaccine, of which there are three:

Gardasil® manufactured by Merck & Company (approved June 8, 2006)

Cervarix® manufactured by GlaxoSmithKline (approved October 16, 2009)

Gardasil 9® manufactured by Merck & Company (approved December 10, 2014)

Their website has an amazing array of information, but the most remarkable first-glance information is the
“HPV Vaccine VAERS Reports Up to Mar 2015,” which blasts very unsettling statistics regarding only HPV vaccines:

Disabled 1,311
Deaths 226
Did Not Recover 7,703
Abnormal Pap Smear 685
Cervical Dysplasia 265
Cervical Cancer 102
Life Threatening 685
Emergency Room 12,429
Hospitalized 4,009
Extended Hospital Stay 267
Serious 5,418
Adverse Events 38,217

Grand Total HPV Vaccine only Problems reported in the CDC database: 71,317 in less than 10 years!

However, that striking number does not represent the exact number of HPV harms since the CDC admits that VAERS
reports actually represent 10 percent, or less, of all vaccine adverse reactions/harms.

If that be the case, then there is a possibility that as many as 382,170 females could be harmed from the HPV vaccines.
OMG!

Is there any wonder why the public is overly concerned about and refusing to get vaccines? Rightfully so!
Take a perfectly healthy child to get shot up with up to nine (9) vaccines at one doctor’s visit and the kid never is
the same afterward. Who, in their right mind, except Big Pharma executives and their medical acolytes, wouldn’t question,
be scared, or refuse to have their child damaged for life? There ought to be a law against damaging a child with vaccines!
VAERS proves it happens more than we know! Kids aren’t the only ones; adults experience vaccine damage, e.g.,
Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) [2].

http://www.secretsofthefed.com/no-matte ... stributed-
via-vaccines/#at_pco=smlwn-1.0&at_si=5540f00d7686698f&at_ab=per-2&at_pos=0&at_tot=1

On top of all the other questionable vaccines children are forced to receive, Gardasil practically guarantees sterility
in its recipients plus lifelong illnesses, if not instant death.

But what if all these nonsensical songs and insane dances never needed to happen in the first place?

One long forgotten book insists that all humanity's problems begin with birth. The way newborns are prevented from
contact with their mothers immediately after birth creates a population of emotional defectives craving for something
they will never find, and from this deprivation stems every form of mental and physical disease imaginable, not
the least of which is the desire for those who crave authority to disfigure those in their power beyond the bounds
of what is either normal, ethical or beneficial.

Discover The Continuum Concept

"Our society must be helped to see the gravity of the crime against infants that is today considered normal treatment,
" wrote Jean Liedloff in her 1975 classic, The Continuum Concept: In Search of Lost Happiness. It is the story of
a young woman who by chance came to live with aboriginal South American tribes and discovered that babies who never left
their mothers' sides grew up healthier, happier and more well adjusted to their lives than their counterparts in
the "civilized" world, who because of the way they were treated upon being born spent their whole lives manically searching
for something they could never find.

...It is no secret that the "experts" have not discovered how to live satisfactorily, but the more they fail, the more
they attempt to bring the problems under the sole influence of reason and disallow what reason cannot understand or control.
We are now fairly brought to heel by the intellect; our inherent sense of what is good for us has been undermined to the point
where we are barely aware of its working and cannot tell an original impulse from a distorted one.

Evolution has not prepared the human infant for this kind of experience. He cannot comprehend why his desperate cries
for the fulfillment of his innate expectations go unanswered, and he develops a sense of wrongness and shame about
himself and his desires. If, however, his continuum expectations are fulfilled — precisely at first, with more variation
possible as he matures — he will exhibit a natural state of self-assuredness, well-being and joy.

Infants whose continuum needs are fulfilled during the early, in-arms phase grow up to have greater self-esteem and
become more independent than those whose cries go unanswered for fear of "spoiling" them or making them too dependent.

Liedloff wrote that for thousands of years babies were birthed and stayed physically connected to their mothers throughout
their earliest days. Today's babies are instantly separated from their mothers, causing a yearning, Liedloff insists,
that leads to a lifetime of confused and unidentifiable yearning.

"The growth of independence the power to mature emotionally spring largely from the in-arms relationship (with the mother)
in all its aspects," Liedloff writes. "One cannot therefore become independent of the mother, except through her, through
her playing the correct role, giving the in-arms experience and allowing one to graduate from it upon fulfillment."

For those who can actually see and understand the problem, the way modern children are birthed is arguably the greatest
tragedy in human history, because it causes a maladjustment in everyone who is born this way, and guarantees a haunting
hankering for the post-birth experience of bonding with one's mother that can never be achieved once that
first opportunity is lost. Emotionally stunted children become pathological adults . . .

. . . clinging with the intensity of leeches to mother figures, regressing to infantile behavior in the hope of being treated
at last as the infant that is still within them starving for its experience.

What could be more pathetic than a child crying for want of mothering and the mother desperately needing to fulfill
her natural mission, yet both prevented from clinging to each other and bonding, guaranteeing a lifetime of normal
and natural behavior? Yet virtually all mothers and babies are denied this opportunity because doctors, relying on
their so-called intellect rather than obvious instinct, insist they know better.

This behavior dooms much of humanity to complicated lives dominated by the feeling that something is always missing.
In Liedloff's words, "the feeling heroin gives is like the feeling the infant has in (his mother's) arms . . . the personality
of the addict, centered upon the drug, discards any semblance of maturity it has managed to attain and settles at
the infantile level where the continuum was interrupted."

In other words, for a few moments, the drug brings us back to the infantile level where we were brutally separated from
our mothers, and without that bonding, we are hopeless to cope effectively with the world.

We are living lives for which our evolution did not equip us, and we are also handicapped, in our attempts to cope,
by faculties crippled by personal deprivation.

Among Liedloff's many relevant observations and recommendations, one stands out. "Criminal character does not develop
in people whose continuum expectations have not been disappointed."

Read a quick digest of the main points of the book here: <http://www.continuum-concept.org/cc_defined.html> .

The way newborns are routinely treated in the civilized world comes down to this: ". . . their torment in infancy prejudices
their ability to enjoy the rest of their lives"

Liedloff also mentions . . . "the loss of serenity caused by the fall of the human species from animal innocence."

And where did we fall that caused all our problems? We fell into intellect, a human hubris that took babies FROM
their mothers during the time of their lives when it was most important for newborns to be connected TO their mothers.

The desire of the powers that be to deliberately maim and cripple our children might seem like the most diabolical act ever
to be perpetrated on humanity, but there might be something worse than that — our inability to take action and rectify this problem.

Instead, we are lackadaisically sliding into a slow white sleep, where we will no longer be able to make decisions for ourselves.
Nursing an injury we are unable to identify, and preferring the half-baked intellect of experts over our own obvious instincts,
this is where we are all headed now, at breakneck speed.

We are yearning for something we can never find and the traces of our frustration can be seen in the scars
we wreak upon the world.


John Kaminski is a writer who lives on the Gulf Coast of Florida, constantly trying to figure out why we are destroying ourselves,
and pinpointing a corrupt belief system as the engine of our demise. Solely dependent on contributions from readers,
please support his work by mail: 6871 Willow Creek Circle #103, North Port FL 34287 USA.
http://therebel.is/en/kaminski
http://johnkaminski.info/
http://www.rudemacedon.ca/kaminski/kam-index.html
http://web.archive.org/web/200403232323 ... inski.com/

.
caretaker
 
Posty: 91
Dołączył(a): Cz cze 23, 2011 7:19 pm

Powrót do Interesting materials in English

Kto przegląda forum

Użytkownicy przeglądający ten dział: Brak zalogowanych użytkowników i 2 gości

cron