Judge admits evidence for Auschwitz is thin

Most of the materials related to the biggest hoax in history are in English.I do not have enough time to translate all this vast amount of knowledge in to Polish language.I decided to open section in our forum.Please place here the materials in English language ONLY.

Judge admits evidence for Auschwitz is thin

Postprzez Jerzy Ulicki-Rek » N mar 25, 2012 12:41 pm

Tuesday, 24 May 2011
Judge admits evidence for Auschwitz is thin
Obrazek

Justice Gray, stated at the 2000 Irving vs Penguin & Lipstadt trial

"I expect you would accept, Professor (Richard) Evans (witness for the defence), just to move on, the number of overtly incriminating documents, wartime documents, as regards gas chambers is actually pretty few and far between?" Trial transcript: Day 20. Page 91

" ... the blue print material, which consists of a series of architectural drawings which depict the adaptation of (Auschwitz-Birkenau's) crematoria 2 and 3 and the construction of crematoria 4 and 5. None of these drawings refers overtly to any part of the buildings being designed or intended to serve as gas chambers whether for fumigation or extermination purposes. In particular the drawings for Leichenkeller (morgue) 1 in crematorium 2 make no provision for ducts or chimneys by means of which Zyklon-B pellets might be inserted through the roof." Judgement 7:59

"The Defendants accept that the physical evidence remaining at the site of Auschwitz provides little evidence to support the claim that gas chambers were operated there for genocidal purposes. The explanation, according to the Defendants, is that, after the revelations in the Allied media concerning the gas chambers at the camp at Majdanek in late 1944, Himmler ordered the dismantling of the extermination installations in the crematoria at Auschwitz. In late 1944 the Nazis duly dynamited the crematoria and destroyed the camp archives (or so they intended: as has been observed above, documents from the Central Construction Office accidentally survived)." Judgement 7:118

"I have to confess that, in common I suspect with most other people, I had supposed that the evidence of mass extermination of Jews in the gas chambers at Auschwitz was compelling. I have, however, set aside this preconception when assessing the evidence adduced by the parties in this proceeding." Judgement 13:71

"What is the evidence for mass extermination of Jews at those camps? The consequence of the absence of any overt documentary evidence of gas chambers at these camps, coupled with the lack of archaeological evidence, means that reliance has to be placed on eye witness and circumstantial evidence." Judgement 6:80

"I recognise the force of many of Irving's comments upon some of those categories. He is right to point out that the contemporaneous documents, such as drawings, plans, correspondence with contractors and the like, yield little clear evidence of the existence of gas chambers designed to kill humans. Such isolated references to the use of gas as are to be found amongst these documents can be explained by the need to fumigate clothes so as to reduce the incidence of diseases such as typhus. The quantities of Zyklon-B delivered to the camp may arguably be explained by the need to fumigate clothes and other objects." Judgement 13:73

Posted by The Black Rabbit of Inlé at 20:48

http://winstonsmithministryoftruth.blog ... tz-is.html
Wolna Polska zaczyna sie tutaj
Avatar użytkownika
Jerzy Ulicki-Rek
 
Posty: 11941
Dołączył(a): Wt lis 06, 2007 2:10 pm

Powrót do HOLOCAUST MYTH

Kto przegląda forum

Użytkownicy przeglądający ten dział: Brak zalogowanych użytkowników i 1 gość